• x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      The people operating the company do not deserve to run it. Maybe they should declare bankruptcy and let somebody who will honor the contracts buy it.

      Allowing this kind of anti-consumer behaviour just allows them to juggle the company around to get out of contracts.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes I think they should just honor the contracts and make a tiny bit less profit.

          They could even just add some sane limits if those were not present yet.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            You have no idea about why they sold or how the financials of the business were.

            Of the contracts stated that the offer could be changed at the company’s choosing, are you ok with it then?

            • x00z@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sorry bud but I’m not going to continue replying to you because of your condescending tone. Are you ok with that?

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I don’t care if you reply or not, it just makes you look like you can’t defend/support your position to even the most basic of questioning.