Hong Kong’s oldest and largest pro-democracy political party is moving to disband as Beijing’s sweeping crackdown on the city leaves even moderate opposition groups with no room to operate.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/19/asia/hong-kong-democratic-party-disbands-china-intl-hnk/index.html


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You mean Chinese territory is being reintegrated after being used as a colonial drug port to drug the Chinese while stealing their wealth. Boo fucking hoo, the media is such a evil tool of propogabda making a big deal outta this and not their home grown government funded genocides and ethnic cleansing other than a “whooosie, Iraq had no wmds or that Gazan hospital indeed isn’t a hamas base”

  • yet_another_commie@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Pro-democracy” party which is actually just a cover for US imperialist propaganda. There’s no place for bourgeois ideas in an actual proletarian democracy that Hong Kong is becoming. This city is probably the only lib state that’s transitioning to socialism

  • selkiesidhe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Democracy is dying everywhere right now. The uprising is going to be bloody and horrible when it eventually happens.

    Maybe I’ll still be alive to see it. Or maybe aliens will blow us the hell up and solve all our problems.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m skeptical there is going to be any kind of uprising. The media algorithms are getting too good. The surveillance is getting too pervasive. The population is getting less educated.

          • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Oh no, they used a word in a way I didn’t like - I guess their opinion about personal freedom and representation are completely invalid.

            Ad Hominem much?

            Chinese people deserve the freedom to express their political views.

            • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Yes, Chinese people deserve freedom to express their political view. And they can do such in the democratic centralism state. Research by Western institutes (in the US for example) shows that the 95% of the people are satisfied with the government

              If you want to learn more about China and unlearn a few misconceptions and propaganda we’ve all been subjected to, this wiki sums up a lot a things: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/People’s_Republic_of_China

              • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Except the organization in question says that they are shutting down because they can’t. 95% of ppl from Hong Kong don’t want $emocratic politics?

            • Matty Roses@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Why is ad hominem the first thing stupid posters always grab for?

              And can’t bother to learn what it means?

              Saying an argument is stupid isn’t ad hominem. Saying the poster is stupid for making a stupid argument isn’t either.

              • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Ironic response. Response said that the wrong word was used, but personally point was not addressed.

        • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Lots of strong democratic events over the last 50 years though. There is hope still.

  • Subdivide6857@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hong Kong’s oldest and largest pro-democracy Capitalism political party is moving to disband

    Sounds like a reason to celebrate.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Of course! Dictatorship won’t through terror and torture, that always is a cause to celebrate because the group that lost might be your personal pet peeve.

      You’re an idiot, tankie

        • CMonster@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          If you had more than a single iota of geopolitical knowledge you would understand how fucking dumb that statement is.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Huh. What? I am definitely not coming to the defense of capitalism. Just trying to help you understand that it’s noy a relevant factor here.

          Your original comment is confused at best. China is communist in many ways but absolutely has a thriving capitalist based economy. The idea that the CCP would be threatened by a “capitalist party” is incoherent and silly.

          You’re making some super huge leaps and I’m not sure why.

          • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Why do you think China has a capitalist economy? Because it is thriving? It is indeed! But this is unrelated to capitalism. Capitalism is not economy good and international market access, socialism share potato and live happily.

            Capitalism is the control of means of production by a few individuals and exploitation of the workers enabled by this private possession. In China, the small and medium companies are allowed to be private but the bigger companies or the ones in critical fields are nationalized. Something like 80% of investment firms are public as well

            You can read more on this wiki: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/People's_Republic_of_China

          • Subdivide6857@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I never said they were threatened. If anyone is making huge leaps, it would be you. You’re making big assumptions based on two sentences. An American media company publishes an article about a dying liberal party in China as if that’s a bad thing. It’s only capitalistic when it’s convenient for you libturds. Otherwise, it’s a “scary state run Chinese company.” I never said capitalism doesn’t exist in the country. You have a funny way of “helping.”

            • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              thing. It’s only capitalistic when it’s convenient for you libturds. Otherwise, it’s a “scary state run Chinese company"

              🙄

              Okay. Sounds good. You’re on a war path against the stereotyped strawman you’ve set up, so I don’t really need to be involved anymore. Carry on. Idc.