Based on recent events, I would be in favour of such a rule.
Communities are not legal institutions. The rules are suggestions to keep the community organized and on subject.
Just because a rule doesn’t exist, doesn’t mean mods are powerless to react to content that breaks the social order.
Not everything needs a rule unless it’s a significant problem or common misunderstanding.
Be the person who caused a rule to be created.
No that person is already Patnou or something, and posting non stop sex facts.
I blocked that guy yesterday out of annoyance. I rarely block anybody.
I don’t know what recent events you mean, but in general I think such rules are overrated. Moderators can remove spam without an explicit rule against spam. Trying to list every possible behavior that a community would reject is never really feasible, we have to rely on human intuition anyway
Reposts 38 more times
On the plus side, there’ll be only one or two of those recent flood-posts left if rule 2 is enforced.
TIL you can break rule 6 as long as you start your post with TIL
