• BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          In those countries the word is not used as a slur, but as a familiar way of referring to one another, which is far from your usage. You pretty clearly did not intend to signify familiarity, but instead to denigrate by use of the word. There are many ways to be denigrating without being chauvinistic, being anti-zionist is not an excuse to do something bigoted.

          Its like when liberals say shit like “Hahaha Trump is fat and gay with Putin!”

            • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Talk me through the last line. Why is it bad that Trump and Putin are gay? Why do you think homophobia is awesome as long as it is directed towards someone you dont like? Why do you think body-shaming is good to do when it is against people you do not like?

              Language is cooked

              I speak five languages. Fuck off.

              It’s like saying 逃げるmakes you racist.

              “Saying a word in a foreign language that sounds kind of like a slur in another language is just the same as saying the actual slur.” Great argument buddy.

                • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  I’d don’t intend to be mean, but do you live under a bridge? I mean the story of how he got ram-rodded by the helicopter pilots kid that he was abusing caused him to wear a diaper. With all the leaks, do you think that didn’t happen?

                  So that isn't actually an answer to my question or in any way related to anything Ive been arguing.

                  It is very typical of your types to be allergic to answering questions, but please do try to answer them. In general I would recommend you actually read what the person you are trying to interact with writes - It helps you to actually have a gainful discussion. Otherwise you end up arguing against ghosts.

                  To help you I’ve honed the questions in even more: Why do you think Trump being gay is a bad thing? Why do you think the sexuality of a person is an inherent negative quality worthy of mockery, as long as the person is someone you dislike?

                  You also have yet to address the body-shaming. Is this because you do understand why it is bad, and by admitting to that then your line of argument for the homophobia would be transparently disingenuous?

                  Why homophobia

                  Mocking someone for being gay is homophobic. Pretty straightforward.

                  Languages

                  Okay? Then you should understand how dumb your argument is, and you should understand speaking more than one is more than enough to understand your argument and see the flaws in it.

                  You’re getting upset

                  I think you are confusing “reading what the other wrote and responding to it” with some other thing? But since we can apparently determine the others emotional state from a brief text: You’re defensive, reactive and malding

                  How is telling someone to fuck off different from using slurs?

                  How is not using slurs different from using slurs? Pretty simple: I’m not using them. You should really try to read what it is I am writing.