I have actually made 0 ad hominem so far. You are confusing “insults” with “attacking the argument through the character”. Of course you wouldn’t know that, halfwit that you are.
The rebuttal has been presented, you have failed to engage with it, you are the one halting discussion.
Well I would love to move on to another discussion and point out the many faulty assumptions and assertions you have made there, but to do that we have to do what I have described many times already. You seem to struggle with reason and civil discussion, consider looking inwards to deal with you having a hard time with simple challenges to your beliefs and a pattern of changing the topic instead of engaging with the text at hand, when that text refutes your pointless vibes-based anecdotal evidence.
You are making a claim but you have no proof for it. What hasn’t worked “here” whereever that is? If you are talking about socialism in the east block it very clearly did work. It was massively popular, improved the living conditions for the population and only fell after decades of capitalist subversion and even then it had to be done through a military coup. And, as the evidence available shows, it is missed today.
Elsewhere it is still massively succesful to this very day.
So I dont understand your question, it seems to be based on a completely fallacious understanding of the world.
I have actually made 0 ad hominem so far. You are confusing “insults” with “attacking the argument through the character”. Of course you wouldn’t know that, halfwit that you are.
The rebuttal has been presented, you have failed to engage with it, you are the one halting discussion.
Ok still no plans though.
Well I would love to move on to another discussion and point out the many faulty assumptions and assertions you have made there, but to do that we have to do what I have described many times already. You seem to struggle with reason and civil discussion, consider looking inwards to deal with you having a hard time with simple challenges to your beliefs and a pattern of changing the topic instead of engaging with the text at hand, when that text refutes your pointless vibes-based anecdotal evidence.
You are making a claim but you have no proof for it. What hasn’t worked “here” whereever that is? If you are talking about socialism in the east block it very clearly did work. It was massively popular, improved the living conditions for the population and only fell after decades of capitalist subversion and even then it had to be done through a military coup. And, as the evidence available shows, it is missed today.
Elsewhere it is still massively succesful to this very day.
So I dont understand your question, it seems to be based on a completely fallacious understanding of the world.