Context a lot of people seem to be missing by only reading the title:
This bar was catering to immunocompromised patrons. Not just women but women who can’t go to other public venues. This seemed to be a big part of the bar’s success.
It would be like a board game pub not letting people play board games one night a week.
But then if you actually read the article, the bar has only been open since last year and has been failing horribly, while the owner is working several jobs and lives in her car to try and keep it open. This was pretty much a last ditch effort to try and make enough money to not have to shut down and now the community members who have wanted a place like this to exist the most are getting all pissy and boycotting it. Essentially guaranteeing it’s closure.
Yeah, this is 100% right.
My State is full of people like this. They scream and moan about things not catering to them… and when what they want does cater to them they won’t support it, and they don’t understand that businesses need customers to exist…
they just seem to want business to exist that cater to them… but don’t actually want to ever patronize to such businesses. but the second that business decides to try and make itself more appealing to more customers… it’s EVIL. And if you patronize this business… YOU are evil now too.
And if you try to point this out to them… they just go mental. They don’t understand that businesses have costs, they think the notion of profitability/sustainability is also EVIL.
Same with housing. They protest for cheaper housing. OK, we need to build more housing then. And then when more housing is proposed to be built, they protest it too. The same people most of the time.
Generally here the people who scream the loudest are the most hypocritical. They screech at everyone we need more small independent businesses… but they all shop at Amazon and Target exclusively.
I agree with you on everything but the housing part. The opponents are more often property owners in the area who have “something to lose” - in their resale value and the neighborhood getting more congested (but let’s be real, their main reason is not wanting to live by the filthy poors)
That said, I wouldn’t have moved here if there was a 20-unit building on the block so I imagine I wouldn’t be thrilled about one getting built.
tell that to half of my renter friends who scream about rent prices but who also think no new apartments should exist and who are up in arms whenever a new apartment building is proposed in the city.
you don’t have to be own property to be a hypocritical dumbass on housing policy. just entitled enough to think you should have cheap housing costs and NOBODY ELSE ever should…
I’m not saying NO ONE is a hypocrite but the most vocal opponents - and the ones most likely to show up to a city council meeting to complain - are property owners in the affected areas. The general whiners aren’t moving the needle much
I worked on a (unfinished as we did not “win”) documentary about Chicago’s bid to host the 2016 olympics so I spent a LOT of time at those and it was exclusively rich people living in gentrified areas
do you go to city council meetings?
I have. It’s not just property owners. it’s a lot of different people who show up, and most of them are dumb as rocks and spout ignorant nonsense, because what they are really doing is vocalizing their feelings that they don’t like change.
and then when someone who is informed or smart shows up, people shout them down as if they are pushing a conspiracy on them, or concern troll them with ridiculous scenarios or demands.
You can blame the rich all you want, in my life experience in housing policy, everyone is an idiot about it, the difference is the rich have the lawyers to gum up the system, but often poor people will do the same way via an advocacy group.
Being poor or renting doesn’t’ make you a saint, despite what lemmy idealists seem to think.
do you go to city council meetings?
Yes, read the second paragraph in my post lol
I haven’t been to one since COVID (and now I’ve moved) but I was also at almost every meeting about the redevelopment of my neighborhood. I lived in a working class commuter area and the only opponents to the apartment buildings were the rich homeowners in the neighborhood over. Their biggest stated concerns were the congestion.
They wanted more chain stores but lost the fight. Even their alderman came out in support of construction so they lost
I think the mistake was trying to run a bar instead of perhaps renting an event center or something a few nights a week. You just don’t have a community large enough to sustain that kind of space, which is the endless tragedy of queer spaces that aren’t in like New York, Los Angeles or London.
I don’t think it needed to be closer to New York, but closer to Amherst certainly would have helped.
And that is a specific joke about that area that few will get.
Considering how deep in the red the bar is that it’s relying on volunteers, success might not exactly be the word. Since it’s got on one remaining owner who was only in it to support two owners who’ve left, the bar is not going to be around much longer without a dedicated, forgiving customer base. I have seen similar establishments with much more accommodating followings close.
So you didn’t actually read it, then.
I think I’m the only one who read it based on the comments.
Making masks optional one whole day of the week hardly seems like something that deserves a boycott, especially if the alternative is the bar going out of business.
Yeah, but they made the poor decision to placate this small demographic for so long, this will always happen when they change.
What year is it?!
The pandemic didn’t end, the numbers just got low enough that most are willing to accept the remainder. Some communities have kept making the effort to stay away from the “acceptable losses” mentality which for those most immunocompromised may be their last lifeline to any in person contact with the rest of humanity.
So thanks for making a facetious joke I guess, but both sides of the issue in the article are real and there are no easy answers.
There were and likely always will be diseases out there that kill people or significantly degrade their freedom in life. It’s not just Corona.
Yes, it’s a bit sad it took this long for enough people to reconsider if that’s ok or not. You’re free to continue choosing and calibrating the acceptable death rate of your actions. Just don’t be surprised when others do not choose the same rate you personally consider acceptable.
This place is literally closing.
You better not drive, or eat meat, or use mined resources.
Nobody is choosing a death rate. The acceptable death rate is obviously zero but live does not work that way. Come down from your high horse.
He said from his own high horse.
☝️"nO yOu!!!1!"
Numbers going down to levels comparable with numerous other diseases is very much the pandemic “ending.” By your logic, the Black Death never went away. Some people still die from Yersinia pestis each year.
It’s one thing to mask up in a real pandemic. It’s another to advocate for a position where humanity will have to remained masked from now until the end of time.
That is call an endemic disease. Which is where most pandemics wind up. Diseases didn’t suddenly come into existence in 2020, it is myopic to think that covid is exceptional. To the immunocompromised all transmittable diseases are dangerous and there are thousands of them that are endemic. The people claiming there is still a covid pandemic are uneducated conspiracy theorist on the same level of the anti-vaxxers.
It’s one night. You think it’s acceptable for the community to hold the bar hostage like petulant children, for attempting to save itself from closing? The last owner is living in her car.
They catered to immunocompromised women.
It’s not because of Covid. It’s because it’s a bar for queer ppl that’s also immunocompromised, suffering of immunologic diseases such as AIDS and the like.
The apology post didn’t land well with their followers due to a lack of alt text. Comments included: “This is not an accessible post,” and: “It indicates the lack of care or interest in Disability intersectionality.”
Are these people strawmen? Because they sound exactly like the kind of people chuds make fun of.
I live in MA. People like this are everywhere here.
They are not straw, they are very real, and they love to go around fucking up everyone else’s good work because they are so self righteous and entitled.
In my own city they wanted to rebuild a park that was falling apart, and the project took 5 years, because insane people living nearby repeatedly sued the city to stop them from fixing/improving this park, and the suite were dismissed again and again because they were baseless, but entitled arrogant people don’t care about anything other than getting their way, and punishing/hurting other people when they can’t. And their ‘talking points’ or ‘concerns’ are always baseless, hysterical, and simple factually wrong.
Good news is they finally started construction on the park last spring, bad news is the costs of rebuilding it are now double what they would have been if they project had proceeded 5 years ago… and this is exactly why everything in the USA pubic works projects costs double or triple what it does in other countries… because so many of our private citizens are deeply emotionally invested in opposing development of any kind whatsoever, even when it’s restoring a park with dying trees and crumbling walking paths.
Lived in a few states, with MA being one for about a year. MA pretty much is the strawman in right wing political cartoons made real. Shit, even doing the state taxes took longer than my federal taxes and the state taxes from the next state I moved to, combined.
Like if half the reactionary folks out there were honest with themselves, they’d realize they don’t hate liberalism or leftism, they just hate Mass.
LOL yeah same to a shocking amount but you can also really bad polyamory to my experience. But also add Portland depending on what side of the country you are on.
We can all be ok with getting the ick from some people.
It’s like they watched PCU and said ‘yes, please’.
… this sounds like classic taking an axe to your own leg scenario. I don’t think there’s that many lesbian dive bars left there for the patrons to decide to financially wreck a bar to be a good decision.
According to the article, there are plenty in the area.
This is such a niche demographic that I have to wonder how it was ever viable. From the article, it sounds like it was specifically targeted towards lesbians (not the broader LGBTQ, or LGBTQ-friendly), who are immunocompromised, and want to spend time at a bar socializing with other immunocompromised lesbians. That’s going to be a vanishly small percentage of any community. I’m betting that total population in the city is what they would need to have at the bar every weekend.
As a business model, it would probably even be a stretch to target that one day per week.
How did people consume food or drinks with masks on?
Carefully
cunningly, like their linguistics.
Haha lesbians haha
Man, I wish I had one bar that had a seriously enforced N95 masks required just one night of the week in my whole city
ahh… so thats what the daily show joke was about
Yeah, lol. I was wondering about it too because it felt very specific.
Shitidentity politics like this is one of the major reasons the left is so fragmented. Calling out this kind of mental illness is considered rude now. I guess we’ll just have to burn it down and start over.Why do Massachusetts lesbians wear masks in the bar?
Because it’s a bar for immunocompromised women and they don’t want people to die.
So… don’t go on the mask-free night…
That kind of defeats the purpose of it being a safe place for immunocompromised women.
Yeah. You know what else defeats the purpose? Getting it shut down because the owner doesn’t wanna be homeless anymore.
Having a mask free night isn’t going to save a failing business. Having vulnerable customers get sick and die there most definitely WILL.
Right, so fuck that woman. It’s her fault for trying to start a business. Let’s not put a sign up telling compromised not to come in that night, let’s just let it go under without trying anything, and condemn that fucking whore to the streets possibly for life, because she dared do something for the community. And don’t forget to be a petulant toxic asshole so the rest of society never stops mocking you.
And the community is allowed to say “we don’t want to come to your bar any more”, and that’s EXACTLY what this boycott is. They aren’t telling her she has to change, just that they won’t be coming to her bar any more if she doesn’t. People are allowed to choose not to visit a piece. And you somehow have a problem with that??? You seem to think a boycott shouldn’t be allowed and that people should be FORCED to visit her bar? WTF is wrong with you?
