• 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Remember when they used to say if you didn’t pay for the product it was because you were the product? Now-a-days you get to pay to be the product.

    • liinux@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      And unironically people enjoy that because it “give” them status

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Corporations are allowed to do whatever they want, whenever they want. There might be a few tiny consequences 10-20 years later that shaves a couple months of profit down, but that is just the cost of business and massive profits for the rest of the time.

      Hope this helps!

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Just like all these AI companies tracking people, totally illegal and gross violation of privacy but the government could give a rip.

        You break a law? Go straight to jail!

        Corporation breaks a law? Ohhh well!

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not every country or country subdivision has two party consent. Canada is a one party consent legislation.

    • thatOneGuy@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      There is probably some technicality in that since it doesn’t record audio, but rather just keeps a transcription - that it might not fall afoul of two-party consent?

      • spizzat2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 days ago

        Even if it is only temporarily stored to RAM for processing, I struggle to see how that doesn’t still count as “recording”.

        • thatOneGuy@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          It probably wouldn’t meet the strict legal definition, as no copy (physical or digital) is left behind for any period of time - as RAM is volatile and its contents disappear on power cycle.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Surveillance capitalism fucking sucks. Can we all go back to the 90’s or early 2000’s?

    The worst thing about this is how ubiquitous Apple watches are. Now everybody who has one is going to have people suspecting them of being unwitting surveillance meat drones.

  • Corvidae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 days ago

    But add an always-listening AI assistant into the mix who’s taking notes on your day-to-day, including your conversations with others who may not know they’re being surveilled, and suddenly Apple’s latest handy feature starts to look a lot creepier. Apple’s other big new Audio Intelligence feature for watches is Live Rewind, which can produce a transcript of the last 15 seconds of audio on your watch face — whether a wake word was said, or not.

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I won’t say it’s not* a privacy nightmare but doesn’t Apple devices process this whole thing on-device? I don’t find it fair to compare this with Meta anything (and only that).

    • valar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      You can’t trust any corporation to keep your data safe and local. They lie about not sending it elsewhere, and even when they don’t, all it takes is one security breech, which every company has all the damn time.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Ok, but prior to this, the listening thing was at least a separate device. Now it can be a watch or sun glasses or your tv…

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes and no company has ever broken its promise or gotten hacked. Nothing stays safe forever. As soon as some AI company makes a future deal for that data your privacy does not matter. Apples been caught before violating privacy laws.

    • Snickeboa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      Plus is doesn’t store the audio nor an infinite log. It just continuously stores the last 15 seconds to my understanding. Meaning, what was said and transcribed 30 seconds ago is no longer accessible.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        The Live Audio is only 15 seconds before it is overwritten. The Transcribe is 7 days before it is overwritten.

      • mriormro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        I don’t give a fuck. Your stupid dweeb watch is just another antisocial surveillance device.

        • Snickeboa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          What the fuck is that response? I don’t own an Apple Watch or anything. I’m just trying to put forth actual facts for the discussion.

          • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s pretty much the expected response when talking about Apple on here. No one cares for actual discussion and nuance.

  • WillieShen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Considering the amount of Apple devices in the wild, I guess what I talk physically to people will be mostly recorded then, not to mention that Google assistant or smth like that maybe doing the same, what a Brave New World.

  • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It isn’t enough to be privacy conscious. Now the spying follows you anywhere you have contact with other people

  • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    12 days ago

    You’ve been able to just record audio with a watch forever now I don’t see how this is significantly worse than that.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Because just recording audio is illegal in two-party consent states. This may or may not be illegal, depending on how judges interpret “recording” vs AI transcriptions of ephemeral recordings.

      Additionally, even in one-party consent states, doing that is creepy and weird. This makes it even easier for weirdos to be creepy and weird. It also sends the audio to a cloud platform to perform the AI transcription. That is new.

      • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I’d err on the side of it being illegal in two consent states as well but I agree that hasn’t been litigated yet and there’s lots of bought and paid for judges.

        It doesn’t actually send the audio to apple though, according to them it’s sent to the phone, transcribed and “condensed” there with that condensed transcription and some context being what is sent to their servers for summarizing.

        https://support.apple.com/en-us/148354

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          https://www.privacyguides.org/news/2026/09/10/new-siri-recap-feature-for-apple-watches-can-create-summaries-of-your-conversations-throughout-the-day-apple-says/

          "Siri Recap, the most interesting of the new features, stores a high-level summary of conversations throughout your day. The raw audio never leaves the Secure Exclave, but a condensed transcript of it is generated on-device and then sent encrypted to Apple’s servers running Private Cloud Compute, the same technology that powers their cloud AI features.

          The claim is that Apple can’t access data sent to PCC, but the way the technology works at some point the data must be decrypted in order to be processed. This makes it distinctly less secure than purely on-device processing. Data is included about context like whether the speech was from a song, whether you were at an event based on your calendar data, and even some location information like your city, state, and country.

          The summary is then sent back to your phone, encrypted, where it will be stored for 7 days unless you choose to save them."