• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Not sure what the downvoters are thinking. I was reading through this whole argument about whether or not guns can just “go off” and kept thinking a) obviously there are cases where people fire a gun they are handling unintentionally, whether because they are idiots or the gun malfunctioned. But b) it doesn’t make a difference in whether he was negligent because he already was when he pointed it at her in the first place. That’s all that should have been needed to get a negligent manslaughter charge to stick, accidental discharge or not, it hit her because he was pointing the gun at her.

    Though I don’t buy it was accidental at all, given the circumstances. Heated argument about Trump just before she’s supposed to leave but first he needs to show her his gun that just happens to accidentally fire while he was pointing it at her?

    Jury nullification goes both ways and that grand jury just condoned the murder of someone who opposed Trump.

    • NEZ27@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Its mostly semantics. Dude is saying guns don’t just go off because of X, Y, and Z. And people are pointing out that X, Y, and Z are the result of negligence.

      People neglecting gun safety is the cause. The gun goes off because of the negligence.