• Mr. Satan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9日前

    While I agree with not buying being better that giving them money. I can’t agree with leadership being smart.

    This thing was never going to be profitable. So they either:
    a) they’re actively malicious — they were never planning on profiting which means this is basically a pump and dump scheme capable of triggering some form of recession;
    b) they’re fucking morons for believing their own fantasies, which judging by their public appearances would track.

    Former seems just as plausible, but my bet is on the latter. These AI bro CEOs seem to be woefully average at best.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9日前

      I’ve worked too many places where “b” is absolutely the answer. Even small companies that you’ve probably never heard of where management is drinking the koolaid. They usually don’t like being asked why someone would actually pay for whatever bullshit they’re selling. The answer, almost without exception, is because one of their CEO buddies told them it was a good idea.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8日前

      The bet was that bigger compute gave more parameters which gave exponentially better intelligence.

      Unfortunately the increase in intelligence is logarithmic under current methods, so the business model is unsustainable.