• Tak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I know this will likely upset many Dems but:

    Dems have the Senate and the Presidency and are completely within their power to pack the Supreme Court and basically alter all of the terrible rulings the Supreme Court has made lately. The problem is that many Dems do not think it is worth packing the court for women, students, or the environment. You can’t just vote your way out of this as you would literally have to pack up and move to West Virginia to vote for a Senator who would be ultimately determining this.

    The system is ultimately flawed and just voting isn’t enough.

    Addition after some research:

    It looks like the Supreme Court is set in size by law and FDR had some of the same problems so it would be likely that this would take an act of congress and not just the Senate.

    Ultimately I feel this is certainly more difficult and makes my criticism of inaction now invalid as Dems do not hold enough of a majority to pass legislation; however I do still see them as responsible for inaction when majorities have been held throughout my lifetime.

    • LeZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Democrats wouldn’t pack the courts

      That would be uncouth, you know, decorum is after all VERY important

      I also think the Parlementarian said no

    • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      With that being said, you’re also correct that voting is NOT enough. Protesting and direct action, mutual aid, and more are all required!

    • Chrisosaur@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      A) They need 50 senators willing to entertain that notion. They only have 49. B) If there were one action that I think would be most likely to kick off Civil War 2, it would be packing the court.

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s a very selective way of saying the Dems aren’t responsible because Dems wont support students, the environment, or women’s rights.

    • minorsecond@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wouldn’t the Rs just do the same thing next time they have power? I get what you’re saying, but isn’t setting that precedent dangerous?

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You’re saying that as if the Rs won’t do the same thing anyway without prior provocation. They’ve literally already broken the law to pack the court and the Democrats sat on their hands. They denied Obama picking a justice because it was “too close to an election” when the election was like six months away, but let Trump pick one when an election was already underway.

        Take off the fucking blinders, the Republicans already do these kind of things.

        They already set the precedent.

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Republicans are channeling full fucking fascism and you think the only thing keeping them from packing the already packed republican court is because Dems haven’t done it first?