☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 days agoBritish aircraft carrier will not be sent to Middle East, say officialswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkBritish aircraft carrier will not be sent to Middle East, say officialswww.ft.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square9linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelorty@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up12·8 days agoIsn’t their only carrier unable to actually engage in any operations due to lack of escorts and/or crew?
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·8 days agoprobably cause it’s not actually sea worthy either
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoI mean, it was built by the French, so probably
minus-squareHorse {they/them}@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agothey have two, one is in dry dock, the other one is the ship the article is about
minus-squarelorty@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 days agoI was referring to the Prince of Wales. It suffered from a lot of technical problems and lack of escorts, but apparently they turned it around. Supposedly.
Isn’t their only carrier unable to actually engage in any operations due to lack of escorts and/or crew?
probably cause it’s not actually sea worthy either
I mean, it was built by the French, so probably
they have two, one is in dry dock, the other one is the ship the article is about
I was referring to the Prince of Wales. It suffered from a lot of technical problems and lack of escorts, but apparently they turned it around. Supposedly.