slothrop@lemmy.ca to Nostalgia@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 month agoit never sounded the same afterlemmy.caimagemessage-square83linkfedilinkarrow-up1614arrow-down166
arrow-up1548arrow-down1imageit never sounded the same afterlemmy.caslothrop@lemmy.ca to Nostalgia@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square83linkfedilink
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 month agoDo you realistically think someone commenting on the Fediverse about media would seriously consider audio cassettes, one of the most popular media formats of the twentieth century, to be an obscure format?
minus-squareslackassassin@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoI mean, I’ve seen dumber. So, yes?
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoIf I actually thought they were obscure it seems unlikely I would have known the name of the format.
minus-squareslackassassin@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoJust having a goof out here but, yes, it is possible to know the name of obscure things.
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoPossible but not probable in this context.
Do you realistically think someone commenting on the Fediverse about media would seriously consider audio cassettes, one of the most popular media formats of the twentieth century, to be an obscure format?
I mean, I’ve seen dumber. So, yes?
If I actually thought they were obscure it seems unlikely I would have known the name of the format.
Just having a goof out here but, yes, it is possible to know the name of obscure things.
Possible but not probable in this context.