I’m starting to fear what happens if he doesn’t.

So they reinvented coaxial cables?

Obviously, as a Firefox user myself, I’m making similar choices.

But I’ll be dammed if I let an opportunity go to waste to remind people that Brandan Eich is disgusting human trash. He’s responsible for JavaScript, and that’s only least of his sins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich

These guys played host to one of the tech world’s most prominent homophobes for decades. I like the browser but the foundation has been trying to fuck everything up since the beginning of the web.

“Economy”

Dude, you need to figure out a way to automate that. It’s no way to live.

Make no mistake: this is an improvement.

There are substantial unsolvable issues with long lived certificates, and automatic deployment of very short lived certificates is the way to solve them.

Plan for certificate validity of six days in a few years.

YES! Keep cutting it down!

Revocation is a lost cause and if you don’t automate you deserve what you get.

Tim had always been a dick head. Since that fucking pinball game.

POSIWID is a reminder to analyse the system the way it is, not the way it should be.

How is moat-less chatbot company worth HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS?

Which means he won the parliamentary elections? What’s tripping you up here?

Fuck that. Labour has to regain the confidence of the labour voters. No better way to do that than to tell “business” and racists to go suck a fat cock.

Unfortunately, Keir is a fucking disgrace.

“Yes, we destroyed the planet. But we made a lot of money in the process”

If there’s a zero chance it would stick, he wouldn’t be scared to visit Belgium, or one of the other countries that have local jurisdiction laws for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

An important part of the effort is culture and esthetics. “ICE SUCKS DONKEY BALLS AND YOU SHOULD AVOID THEM LIKE THE PLAGUE INFESTED RAT FASCISTS THEY ARE” is a message worth amplifying, even if the tool to actually do the avoidance is flawed.

Yes, it’s theater. But theater is praxis too.

Xellennial here. Please overlook us. Being “the middle child of history” (remember that quote?) does us just fine.

Nothing to see here. Go bother gen Z.

The terfs will not be missed.

Yes, but this suit about a different matter (access to source code) which is a user right in the license. It’s the whole point of the GPL. In this suit the users (ie. The buyers of the devices that have received the binary distribution) obviously have standing.

The problem with relicensing is that the “authors” of a creative work (remember, this is copyright law) are changing the terms of the distribution, and the authors are allowed to do that. The issue at hand is whether the person doing the changing of the terms is allowed to make this change on behalf of “the authors”.

The users may be impacted by this decision, but they are not a part of the decision making process. Hence, no standing.

What you need in a relicensing is someone that asserts (co-) authorship of the work. That’s a much taller order.