He said “for young kids”, never said they were his.
He has a legion of kids with several different women and does not live with them. He’s more likely to buy legos for his friend at the Epstein club than to do anything nice for his kids anyway.
I think we can already see what happens when jobs get scarce and salaries don’t keep up with prices, because it has already been happening almost everywhere. Not because of AI, yet, but if AI accelerates it, you can sort of see where things are trending.
People can’t afford even basic needs like housing and consume less. Even businesses like McDonald’s, that usually do well when people are low on money, are starting to feel the pinch.
Economic troubles tend to become social unrest. Mass protests recently erupted in Spain over housing prices for instance.
Social unrest and economic uncertainty breed political instability and tribal thinking (we have to protect our homes, our country first) which result in violent power takeovers or democratic approval shifting to political parties that can most effectively “speak” to our fears and self-preservation instincts.
If AI really kills 30% of the jobs while, at the same time, driving energy prices up, it’s exponentially more of what we’re already seeing.
“Geez, chill out, guys! I was just gossiping with the smart TV and the doorbell about Cindy flaunting her new, expensive RAM everywhere
I don’t know, but my 2 yaers old does this too: “you NEVER let me have chocolate!”
So in my head I see Trump also saying “NOBODY will ever build me a monument” while pouting, crossing his arms and wiggling his shoulders back and forth for emphasis.
Same! I got to the third paragraph of the article before understanding they were not planning to harass their customers (or at least not in new ways…)
except that those links are increasingly pointing to slop content anyway. Even scientific papers.
Next: why do we even need the planes; we can directly catapult stones on the enemy! Wonder why nobody ever thought about it
Firet sentence in the article
Social network MySpace is reportedly planning to make a comeback
No. Planning to make a comeback is not the same as making a comeback. You are making a comeback when lots of people are actually using your site.
To be fair, there is this tiny group of people who are responsible for a lot of terrible things in my life, but they never seem to get punished. They might temporarily get voted out, but they keep coming back.
Fun read! I think a closed fist with seven fingers would have been a better illustration tough…
if you’re far enough to the right apparently everyone looks like a Marxist. Even Hitler was a National Socialist (Socialist!)
Look, it’s statistically possible that the flight attendant is just a piece of s##t.
But, having been friends with one, I’m also open to the possibility that they just know they are going to be sealed in a flying can with a lot of nervous people and just want to go through a whole f###ng flight without someone getting triggered or panicking.
The poor guy has been misunderstood, he wasn’t trying to insult Trump. After Slytherin was renamed to “Hogwarth MAGAs” he has been sent to shield Trump from harm with his “Protecto Pedophilus” spell.
I think that’s so type inference can work by just omitting the type, instead of having to use “var” or “auto” in front of the variable name
I think the EU are just trying to get some of the money quickly before Google spends all of it on AI
Not to be anti-AI, but… AI coding stats from a AI coding company are as trustworthy as studies from Marlboro on the health effects of smoking or from Volkswagen on car emissions.
I mean, it would still make more sense than SpaceX + xAI. Unlike a data center, a Tesla did actually go to space
There’s a financial bubble and a mental bubble. They are related and feed each other but they are not the same and might not blow up at the same time.
The Market, according to the article, isn’t losing its faith in AI as the Ultimate Technology (the mental bubble or “AI psychosis”). It’s just questioning its belief that one or two companies might be able to squeeze massive profits out of it (the financial bubble).
Investors thought one AI winner would emerge relatively quickly, a new SuperGoogle or HyperAmazon that would make all the money in the world by providing access to AI to every other company. The AI winner would then gleefully enshittify their product while making it more expensive over time, eventually turning huge profits (even including the Trillions of investment spent to get there).
Now, with multiple companies that are offering an almost equivalent product and are forced to compete on price while already bleeding billions every quarter, everyone might just run out of money before the winner is declared. Not a scenario many are willing to invest in.
But the idea that AI can do everyone’s job or give anyone 100x superpowers will still be out there. And all the CEOs and CTOs who thought they would look like thought leaders if they bet everything on AI will not easily change their minds all at once. They will still be easy marks for the next snake oil salesman, selling them a product based on cheap, less powerful models or whatever they can insist can still perform the 100x miracle at an actually bearable cost.
Some might actually be useful products, it’s just that if the mental bubble, overinflating what AI can do doesn’t blow, they can still be sold way above their actual worth.
they are hiring more, so they can reach their layoff targets
I heard the US President does a mean parody of an unhinged Donald Trump. Very funny