Yes, well, you are not “the people”, you are “a person”.

Yeah I opened a business as well but quickly realized it’s nearly impossible without capitulating to the monoliths that are modern advertising platforms from Meta and Google.

You can change your default search provider on any platform. The problem is no one actually does it, and Google is always the default, because they invest billions of dollars in that arrangement.

Does it let you change other people’s search providers?

Wondering what’s fueling the AI bubble? Spoiler: it’s not company profits. It’s this.

Sad to see the Swiss are still complying with demands from a fascist regime.

If you’re going to be doing illegal shit in your activism, you should consider using anonymous communication methods like SimpleX.

Saying “The people voted for this” sounds logical but the reality on the ground makes the statement wholly disingenuous.

It’s not. There’s no other way to have a govt “for the people” than to hold an election.

it functions as a thought-terminating cliche and provides cover for a class of power who continuously work to keep this set of circumstances cemented in place.

That may be but it doesn’t make it untrue.

Unfortunately, the people voted for this.

Despite that, they say that GitHub didn’t even respond to their counterclaims, and just shut the whole thing down the minute Nintendo asked.

You are a fly on the wall of one of the biggest tech companies in the world. They have no interest in going to court for you just so you can keep your emulator on their site.

but not for 3rd party app stores.

Yes it is.

The app stores inside Google Play would be 2nd party app stores.

It’s only 2nd party if there’s some sort of transaction involved, which there isn’t AFAIK.

No they were forced by Epic.

They have existed but they’re now available in the Google Play Store.

ignoring legislation designed to stop the spread of Chinese propaganda — and instead helping to broker a partial sale to businessmen close to Trump. spread American propaganda.

FTFY

Who said the priest would forbid such a thing?

…The priest? I don’t understand the question.

We’re examining why the priest’s answer might have changed.

The priests answer changes because the question changes, as I’ve outlined above.

You’ve omitted half the information

I’ve omitted half of the part that doesn’t matter, as I explained in the comment. It doesn’t matter what comes after them, the answers will always be the same.

“Is it okay if I smoke while doing a cartwheel?” Guess what? The answer is still no.

“Lie” implies intent. Do you have evidence of intent?

We are now rolling out a second, independent LLM review step. Translators must run the completed draft through a separate model

LOOOLOL what a bunch of morons

If you can’t translate it properly, you have no business translating it, you’re just making Wikipedia worse and eroding the trust users place in it.

Is that it? What about “bugs and finickyness”?

I agree, and yet that is the complaint I hear over and over. I don’t understand it, but it is.

the priest rationalizes two completely different answers based on the way the question is posed.

No, the priest is answering 2 different questions:

1. Is it okay to smoke, to which the answer is always going to be no.
2. Is it okay to pray, to which the answer is always going to be yes.

The second question does not ask if it’s ok to smoke. What else they’re doing doesn’t impact the question.