The point of the meme is more that the “expert” advice is very generic and vague, while someone with ADHD will tell you the specific method they use for a specific situation, which is much more actionable for other people with ADHD. Telling someone to eat better or exercise more isn’t the same as explaining how to do those things.

I finally managed to break out of 3 months of Angine de Poitrine yesterday. Definitely a record for my musical obsessions.

I think this misunderstands illnesses in general and is low-key dismissive of mental health issues.
One of your sons care is different for the same reason ones might be different if they both had flu but were suffering different severities of it. One might just need some bed rest, while the other could end up in hospital on a ventilator if their case is more severe. That ventilator won’t particularly help the one that needs bed rest, but is necessary for the other.
The difficulty in diagnosing is pretty inherent to mental health in general - where’s the cut off for depression, when one person is just numb to the world and another is constantly breaking down and trying to kill themselves? What about anxiety, where one person could freeze up a bit in social situations while another starts panicking as soon as they step outside? They’re still interfering with your life, just to different degrees.

You mean Tetsuya Nomura?

Ben Garrison is a satirical artist who portrays good things as being wanted by “sickos” in opposition to the hyper conservative characters in his cartoons.

This is tremendously funny, you just lack context.

It’s a lot easier to lose nukes when you have tens of thousands than it is if you have up to 60.

Removed by mod

You could have just asked those questions 3 days ago when you got the source, why are you upset about being treated with the same respect you give?

OH what a surprise, it DOES turn out you were just here to JAQ off all along. You’re as easy to see through as folahts’ source is to find.

1. Yes? I’m confused, is there no subject you’re familiar enough with to recognise sources?

2. Yes it does, it doesn’t qualify as a reference, but luckily you’re looking at the Wikipedia page so you can just click it instead.

3. Yes, people make mistakes, but luckily sometimes other people like me are around to correct them.

4. No, I can justify my attributionby the fact that there’s only one (1) source that lists the dead by faction, the numbers just show how they misremembered the specifics of the source.

This isn’t some complex chain of advanced logic, I really don’t understand what you’re having trouble with.

Correct, as I said elsewhere they got the distribution wrong because they are working off memory, but it’s not difficult to link the numbers - they mistook the police and army as having the same number of deaths as civilian protestors rather than student protestors, but the total roughly matches and there’s only one source that makes that specific distinction between groups rather than a general guess at a total. I don’t understand why you’re so upset about being told the source after asking for the source.

Well if you’re already reading a wiki article I’m not sure how you’d have trouble matching the source. As I said elsewhere they got the distribution wrong, but you’re making it sound like you’re just here to JAQ off.

You thought wrong. So back to the question, what cause would he become a martyr for, that the other dead couldn’t be martyrs for?

Probably the official CPC figure of 241 killed in total. Most of the serious estimates broadly agree - NSA said 180-500, and the Tiananmen Mothers organisation have identified 198 of the dead.

I think the numbers are a bit off - official Chinese figures were ~20 student protestors, ~20 police and army, and about 200 other protestors were killed.

A martyr for what? There were already plenty of dead to martyr, what difference would he make?

The problem with pissing all over Thatcher’s grave is that you eventually run out of piss.