That person signed onto a rare and exclusive contract to produce a specific food item. The contract was designed specifically to create rarity for that item so they could control the price and artificially raise it. He was fine with destroying food up until he felt like he didn’t get paid enough. His giving away the food was an act of spite, not generosity. He only did it to get back at the company he signed the contract with. This is not a good person.

This is just a story of two greedy profit chasing parties fighting with each other. Fuck em both.

Businesses are not people. Don’t expect them to act like “good” people. Regulation and unions are the only things that shape the morality of a busniess.

So I do find this kind of interesting. The feds can’t tell a state how to run their election. But usps is a federal entity. So I don’t see why trump can’t tell them not to handle ballots. I don’t like it, but I am not really sure there is sound legal recourse.

Spoken by someone who has no idea what I am talking about… but great job making my point.

You did uncover an important point. One I discuss with doctors commonly. If their treatment plan is something I can’t practically do, then it isn’t a good plan. For example, I have significant adhd. If the treatment plan calls for a midday pill, that just isn’t going to happen consistently. My adhd ensures that. Most of the time they have no other options. The medical system assumes everyone is sane and nuerotypical in the treatments I designs. So now imagine someone with pill anxiety.
So just because she didn’t do what the doctor’s said, doesn’t mean their plan was realistic and transfer all the guilt to her.

In response to my comments about how the democrates enable the GOP, you said “Fascism is not equally as bad as liberalism and you people will never convince me otherwise.” I took that to be saying the gop is fascism, and the democratic party is liberalsim. To which I have disagreed that the democratic party is liberalism, but instead pretends to be, yet just enables the gop to do it’s thing because they both serve the same masters.

Also, I am aware of the supermajority and the filibuster. Those details are the same for both parties. Yet the gop manages to pass more legislation that supports their cause then the democrats. And yes, most legislation doesn’t pass in general. That’s because it is often just for publicity with no intent of it passing.

That’s the party leadership for ya.

First that isn’t what I said. Liberalism does not equal the democratic party is what I said. Liberalism is it’s own thing. The democratic party is it’s own thing. The democrats give lip service to liberalism. But they don’t actuall accomplish much. And you know the democrats controlled the senate at the time of that bill you linked… interesting how they just can’t seem to overcome the same obstacles that the GOP overcomes. Almost like they just aren’t trying as hard because they don’t really want to pass such things.

Responding with catchphrases and personal attacks. You sound like someone who has nothing of value to add, but can’t stop themselves from posting a comment anyway.

The democratic party is not liberalism. They pretend to be to get votes. But where is the law that protects the right to abortion, or gay marriage. They never bothered to pass one because that would slow down and maybe even stop the GOP from doing what it is doing. They know the power swings like a pendulum, so they knowingly leave the door open. As long as they have the GOP to campaign against, they don’t have to do anything substantial. Which of course would upset their corporate donors.

More than allow, they are specifically enabling it. Allow would be to just do nothing. They actively try to thwart any polotician who does want to do something. They are litterally protecting them.

Yes, both sides. The one cannot exist without the other. We have all seen how hard the democratic party fights against any progressive candidate that wants to make real change. And when the dems are in control, they do nothing to protect us from the GOP. Even when it is favored by the majority of americans. They are enablers.

Always we focus on the cops and the shooting. What about we take a look at how the situation was even possible. Poor healthcare. And I mean that on both sides. A person who will shoot at a vehicle driving away has mental health issues as well. The system failed all of them.

Apologies. I got threads confused in my head. Some people really felt the need to make personal attacks for stating my opinion. This was not that thread.

Did you need an adjoining room for your kids?

Ok, so sharing my experience is bad? I never said that the things that happened to me happen to everyone. In fact in other threads I said most travelers are traveling dor business and not with kids. So the adjoining room and such doesn’t matter then, and is probably why plenty of people haven’t experienced my issues. But I’m the bad guy because I didn’t rip on airbnb or something? Ok. I thought this wasn’t reddit. My bad.

I am just describing my experience. Just because it wasn’t yours doesn’t mean it is wrong. Of course with an ego the size of yours, that is probably something you can’t fathom.

The gas one was a luxury hotel in Oregon. The place overall was nice. But very short on staff. And thenone person at the front desk was clearly brain dead.

The others… major chains here and there as well as mgm properties in vegas.

Most travelers don’t travel with kids. They are usually traveling for business. So they don’t have the issues of adjoining rooms, or having to put 3 or 4 people in one room. Even the “suites” often only have one toilet. That’s because they cater to the solo travelers, or couples. They don’t really want families.

Never had either of those issues. And never knew anyone who actually had those issues for real. Just random internet people who claim it happened. Though I do favor vrbo over airbnb. But I doubt it’s much different.